O sujeito como operador de uma indeterminação: dialética, psicanálise e ato educativo

Abstract

The experience of modernity enables a comprehension of the subject based on regularities on the way of being, acting, judging and so on. There is a normativity that regulates social life, and the subject exists as this possibility of setting up its own field of experience. A theory of the subject, from this perspective, corresponds to an understanding that the human founds his ground of experience as a process of unity and self-identity, lying there the core of normativity that organizes social life. Criticising the category of the subject corresponds to grounding a theorisation that is not compromised with identitary modes of determination of the subject, but that understands how the field of experience structures itself through events from a negativity. In Žižek, we can find the problem of the subject as the main core of his thought, but he operates an inversion from the tradition that contains a fundamental passage from a metaphysics of identity to a negative ontology. This way, the main problem of this paper is to develop alternatives in relation to a theory of the subject committed with the idea of human finitude, chained to an identitary principle: thinking the ways of comprehending the humane beyond representation. In opposition to a philosophy of identity, Žižek’s work has been directed on the problem of excess/lack in the order of being, and it is through the relation between German idealism and psychoanalysis that he developed his reflections. This perspective opens a fundamental political field, because the power of dismission of structural modes of subjetivation guards the possibility of new modes of subjectivation. Thus, the subject is the one who carries the transcendental condition of possibility and impossibility of the ways of being. A politics aiming at emancipation must break with the comprehension of man based on identitary figures. In face of these problemes, it is necessary to establish an humanity freed from the category of the “human”, that allows new political arrangements. The “inhuman”, then, would be precisely this dimension of the impersonal and depersonalized, that which cannot be singled out through the recognition of individual psychological processes. Thus, the critical pedagogical-political act institutes its own legality, suspending the Law of the prevailing oppressive power, opening up spaces for creativity and the establishment of a process of socioeconomic, cultural and political emancipation.