Estudo da barreira funcional intestinal e concentrações séricas de rifampicina e isoniazida em pacientes com tuberculose multirresistente

Abstract

Reduced antituberculosis drugs concentrations are associated with Mycobacterium tuberculosis resistance. This study aims to evaluate intestinal permeability and serum concentrations of rifampin (RIF) and isoniazid (INH) in patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). A case-control was conducted with outpatients who attended Messejana’s Hospital in Fortaleza-Ceará from August 2006 to April 2007. MDR-TB (case) was defined as resistance to at least RIF+INH according to the susceptibility test by the proportion method. Two control groups were formed. The drug sensible TB (DS-TB) group defined so when the isolate was sensible to RIF, INHH, streptomycin and ethambutol and the healthy control group (HC). The final MDR-TB, DS-TB and health control groups composition was 41, 33 and 41 respectively, matched by sex and age. Biochemical and haematological examinatios, lactulose:mannitol (L/M) test (to access intestinal absorption) were performed as well as social and clinical interview in all volunteers. To access the serum concentrations two blood samples were collect at two and six hours after RIF and INH ingestion in 32 MDR-TB and 28 DS-TB patients and 30 HC. The drug serum concentrations and L/M test in urine were performed by HPLC. After univariate analysis the median/range of the L and M urinary excretion percentage was significantly lower in MDR-TB patients comparing to HC (p<0.05). Adjusting for alcoholism+tabagism association or Body Mass Index (BMI), this difference disappeared for lactulose. After multivariate analysis the mean ± standard (sd) deviation M urinary excretion percentage was lower in MDR-TB than in HC (p=0.0291) group or DS-TB (p=0.0369) group. The L:M ratio did not differ between the groups (p=0.4747). The mean±sd of the INH maximum serum concentration (HCmax) was higher in MDR-TB (3.82±1.18) than in HC (2.79±1.19) group, p<0.01 and there was no difference between DS-TB and HC nor between MDR-TB and DS-TB groups. After multivariate analysis the HCmax increased in HC (3.07±0.24), but, remained to be higher in MDR-TB group, and now, significantly higher only than DS-TB group. There was HCmax < 3 µg/ml in 18.8% (6/32) of the cases and 56.7% (17/30) of the HC (p<0.05) and no difference between DS-TB (39.3%, 11/28) and HC. After multivariate analysis the mean±sd RIF maximum serum concentration (RCmax) was lower in MDR-TB than in HC(p,0.05) and in DS-TB than in HC (p<0.001), with no difference between MDR-TB and DS-TB groups. The RCmax was < 8 µg/ml in 90.6% (29/32) of the cases and 66.7% (20/30) of HC (p<0.05) and in 82.1% (23/28) of the DS-TB patients (comparing to HC, p<0.05). In conclusion there was reduction in transcellular intestinal absorption in MDR-TB versus DS-TB or HC and the data suggest that alcoholism+tabagism association and BMI have an important role in the reduction of paracellular transport in MDR-TB patients. The RCmax was low in MDR-TB and DS-TB patients with high proportions of subtherapeutic levels in theses groups, mainly for RCmax, but also worrying for HCmax.