A interincompreensão mostrada: uma proposta de sistematização

Abstract

The present work, standing in the perspective of the French Discourse Analysis and aligned to the prevailing conception of heterogeneity in the discipline, takes as the main theoretical framework the contributions of Maingueneau (1983, 1984) , who developed the notion of discursive controversy as generalized interincomprehension. According to the author, interincomprehension corresponds to the impossibility of discourses produce and understand utterances of another discursive practice from the rules of this one. Unlike the author, we believe interincomprehension, besides having a constitutive dimension, also has a dimension that shows in the discursive materiality, ie, we understand that the translation operated by a discursive practice on the other discourse is often somehow shown in the text through linguistic and discursive strategies that we systematize. Therefore, we use a variety of utterances from the humorous discursive field, that we consider especially controversial, from which we perform our analysis and we wrote our proposal of systematization. From the analysis, we observe the existence of strategies in which the linguistic and discursive components are interwoven, both in equilibrium with regard to relevance. This is the case of refutation, irony and the polemical use of the verb "to be". Other strategies, however, are markedly more discursive. In this case, we refer to the seven mechanisms identified in the last chapter: use of the 1st person of the speech to enunciate as simulacrum of the Other; use of quotation marks; feature of a discussion between characters (Same X Other); association of the Other to discourses that derive their credibility / legitimacy; debate Same X Other from controversial sema; use of 1st person and emphasis to the simulacrum of the Other from exaggeration; assigning voice to the simulacrum of the Other in order to "catch him" in its contradictions.